Showing posts with label Tom Wilkinson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Wilkinson. Show all posts

Friday, 21 October 2016

Proof: Review of Denial

Denial

Director: Mick Jackson

By Alex Watson



Some excellent performances are sadly not enough to prop up Mick Jackson's Denial. While this is a solid and thought-provoking story of the notable libel case involving holocaust denier David Irving, it lacks the needed spark to bring it to life. David Hare's script is a well-paced one, but Jackson's direction often flounders, letting down what could have been a gripping story.

Deborah Lipstadt (Rachel Weisz) is a Jewish-American academic who has recently released 'Denial: The Holocaust on Trial' which is highly critical of the opinions of Nazi historian David Irving (Timothy Spall). When Irving confronts her directly and challenges whether the Holocaust ever existed, Lipstadt is insulted. Soon after, Irving sues her for libel in England and forces her to prove whether this great atrocity ever existed. With the help of QC Richard Rampton (Tom Wilkinson), she sets out to prove him wrong.

While Denial is a moving picture that deals well with the absurdity of having to prove hard facts, Jackson doesn't succeed in making memorable. Things start well with Irving confronting Lipstadt during a lecture at Emory University in Atlanta. He openly dares her to prove whether the Holocaust ever took place, taken aback Lipstadt refuses to debate facts. Irving is a cunning edge to the movie that holds the glue together and when he sues her, we can tell he isn't going to go quietly. Highly intelligent and self-educated, Irving is a man who firmly believes his theories and will go down swinging to prove them. Soon after, Lipstadt recruits barrister Anthony Julius (Andrew Scott), who famously represented Princess Diana during her divorce who then aids her in getting headstrong QC Richard Rampton.

From there Jackson decides to make this a straightforward legal drama, there are moments that do raise the game such as an emotional trip to Auschwitz with Dutch scholar Robert van Pelt (Mark Gatiss). But the majority of the action before court time is Deborah squabbling with her legal over the best approach to expose Irving's lies. She wants to put former Holocaust suffers on the stand to give validity to the argument- Julius passionately refuses. Irving is a slippery fish in court and gives his now famous statement about the lack of evidence of three chimneys used for cyanide in gas chambers. 'No Holes, No Holocaust' he claims and the case seems at a standstill. During this time there are scenes which do go to a deep core, in particular when during a dinner Lipstadt is encouraged by a Jewish organisation to settle with Irving.

The finale should have the needed fireworks, but Jackson seems uninterested in releasing them. This lack of emotional involvement gives the movie a void that is impossible to fill. Some key flaws in Irving are exposed and it seems his theories of Nazi Germany might have other influences. Overall the movies rolls towards its expected conclusion and while the voices of those who perished are heard loudly, we can't help but feel that this is just tailor made Oscar bait. Mick Jackson, who previously directed The BodyGuard does show some promising touches during the court scenes but this piece really should have been so much more.

Rachel Weisz for what is possibly the first time in her career fails to sufficiently convince us. Her Queens accent feels strained and seems like that is what Weisz is giving primary attention to for her character. Usually an engaging actress, Weisz feels drastically miscast in this role. Timothy Spall firmly steals the acting honours with an impressive turn as Holocaust denier, David Irving. A self-educated and proud man, Irving is a man who seems to have an answer for anything thrown at him. Spall gives this character a likeable and charismatic feel that makes disliking his convictions hard.

Denial is a movie that wants to be considered for the big prizes but unfortunately, it falls short of what it wants to bring across.


Sunday, 25 January 2015

Long March To Freedom: Review of Selma

Selma

Director: Ava DuVernay

By Alex Watson



After being controversially overlooked in several key categories at the Oscars (despite scoring a Best Picture nod), Ava DuVernay's Selma is an engaging look at the 1965 Selma to Montgomery march. Although slightly dragging in places, this piece comes alive with a spirit that is undeniable. DuVernay never once holds back from showing the sometimes violent consequences of the Civil Rights movement. But through non violent resistance and determination, a crucial cornerstone in US History is made.

In 1965, Martin Luther King (David Oyelowo) is concerned that although segregation has ended, black citizens are still being denied their right to vote. Bring his thoughts to President Lyndon Johnson (Tom Wilkinson), the big man is reluctant to get involved despite many recent racial related deaths in the southern states. In order to bring about change, King and his supporters descended upon the town of Selma, Alabama and plan to march to the state capital Montgomery. Their mission will be no simple one and all the way there is substantial damage to bring about change.

Smartly picking the story up when Dr King received his Nobel Peace Prize rather than his "I Have a Dream" speech, Selma is a very focused effort by DuVernay who ensures that the story is told in a bold but never lecturing fashion. From the very outset, their work in Selma is tainted. Alabama was a difficult place to make progress and under racist governor George Wallace (Tim Roth), black voters were hindered at each turn. One of the opening scenes sees Annie Lee Cooper (Oprah Winfrey) attempt to register, only for the court clerk to ask her impossible questions until she cannot answer! As King himself points out to Johnson, racist killers are always absolved by all white juries because the black people cannot be part of the process.,.. unless they are register to vote.

Although there are no less than three tense and brutal marches that occur with DuVernay's film, the real story in this film comes from the back room politics. Through these scenes we see the preciseness and subtle power of King's strategy through non violent protests. However, it is these scenes that on occasions derail the film slightly. The power of MLK's oration is present, along with his continually strained relationship with wife Coretta (Carmen Ejogo). Problem is it often seeps into needlessly long monologues that delay the action. A sense of hardship occurred in the marches is also disappointingly absent and this subject feels more tailor made for awards. Although we see King proudly preaching their victory on the steps of the State Capitol, we never truly feel the required power desired for this result.

Where Selma does succeed though is in the unflinching portrayal of the notorious first Selma march where the predominantly white police force horrifically turned a peaceful protest into a national televised nightmare. As we feel the batons club innocent victims and see them run for their lives in the midst of tear gas, a great injustice is unfolding. Though this makes for horrifying viewing, a crucial breakthrough is made. Attitudes in the country swiftly changed and people from all corners of America descend upon Selma! Even Johnson who has been sat on the fence up until this point is finally forced to act.

But the film is carried on the shoulders of the excellent David Oyelowo who with a great subtle skill is mesmerising as MLK. Embodying the required charm and allure, the British actor is fascinating in the quieter moments of this character and is not afraid to give it gusto when it comes to the speeches of King! Cruelly denied a Best Actor nomination, Oyelowo has finally been given the role that he was born to play and from this point onwards, Hollywood should take note of this. Great support is given by Tom Wilkinson as the conflicted Johnson and Tim Roth who makes from a great on screen menace as the narrow minded Wallace.

Many will still complain about Selma not receiving more nominations, and in some ways it is a shame because DuVernay herself does deserve credit. This film is an inspiring one and we will get few civil rights films that match the power of this one. Dr King's victory was one that forever be echoed in history, but it was a fight that wasn't without casualties!