Stupify: Review of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

Director: David Yates

By Alex Watson

Two installments in and the Fantastic Beasts franchise is still struggling to find sure footing. The first outing had some kinks but Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald fails to iron them out. While there are individual moments that impress, the amount of CGI finesse cannot disguise the thinly layered plot and the lack of narrative. The wizarding world is a place of limitless potential, but in the hands of David Yates, its effect is starting to slip.

Permanently banned from international travel after the events in New York, Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) is thrust back into the fight against evil by old professor Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law). Meanwhile, evil wizard Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) cunningly escapes from prison and sets his plan to have pure-bloods dominating both the wizard and muggle worlds. There is also the added problem of troubled young wizard Credence (Ezra Miller).

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is a rather tame beast throughout. Often promising more than it delivers, we are left with what feels like a build up for the next installment. The first half certainly delivers some stunning pieces- such as Grindelwald's daring escape from a flying carriage. This picture also makes the most of its 1927 Paris setting and the cinematography by DP Phillipe Rousselot is among the movie's biggest accomplishments. Sadly JK Rowling's script is content just to plod along exploring any number of side plots. Newt is still dealing with the fallout from his New York adventures and is unwilling to 'pick a side' with the upcoming good vs evil fight. This character while the clear lead is oddly rather bland and unappealing. Newt still pines for his crush Tina (Katherine Waterson) and a large portion of the movie teases the 'will they/ won't they' business.

Some of the major plot points hit- such as muggle Jacob (Dan Fogler) attempt to keep his romance to Queenie (Alison Sudol) on track. A mismatched pair as Queenie is pure blood, this gives us the very definition of a doomed romance. Credence is a character that everyone pursues- but in reality, his character is given little to do except look sullen. Grindelwald while a scene grabbing villain is restricted to only a couple of key scenes. His appearances provide some bursts of colour and potential for an epic showdown. This lack of inclusion proves frustrating and the movie seems more invested in bringing to light the backstory of Lita LeStrange (Zoe Kravitz) than it does with developing its villain. While Dumbledore's inclusion does throw more light on what is ultimately a very bold and tricky wizard, he is given barely any time to make an impact.

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is its lack of resolution. Towards the end, Grindelwald holds what is arguably a mass pure-blood rally. Rather than going away satisfied after a mass magic battle and some closure thrown in for good measure- we are instead left confused and deflated. What feels like a blockbuster finale is in fact rather flat and lifeless affair. There is a cliffhanger feel and perhaps the third outing with finally satisfy all tastes. David Yates is now on his sixth outing in the wizarding world. He did a stellar job over the final four Harry Potter films. So far, the Fantastic Beasts franchise has been less kind to his abilities and this begs the question if he should make way? Some blockbusters know how to leave audiences wanting more- this picture does it the wrong kind of way.

Eddie Redmayne while a capable actor doesn't feel like a good fit for Newt Scamander. Often struggling to completely convince as the awkward and bumbling wizard, Redmayne has yet to find the groove of this character. Katherine Waterson is one of the most underrated actresses on the planet. Once more she is shortchanged in a big movie and her Tina Goldstein is given little chance to make an impact. Johnny Depp however, despite a lack of screentime is thoroughly commanding as Grindelwald. There was controversy galore over his casting, but Depp is very much the villain the series needs.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is a movie that promises a great deal but seems content to let its audience sit and wait.

Family Business: Review of Logan Lucky

Logan Lucky

Director: Steven Soderbergh

By Alex Watson

When he's not in between movie retirements, Steven Soderbergh does remind us what a great director he is. Logan Lucky might not be his strongest outing, but it still showcases what great character's he is capable of creating. The plot might be a little confusing in places, but there is a method in what Soderbergh and writer Rebecca Blunt are doing. On fun alone, this picture makes for great viewing.

After losing his mining job, West Virginia native Jimmy (Channing Tatum) resorts to pulling off the ultimate heist. Bringing along his one armed brother Clyde and sister Mellie (Riley Keough), the trio plan to rob the Charlotte Motor Speedway during the Coca-Cola 600 Nascar race. However, for their job to be successful they must recruit the imprisoned explosives expert Joe Bang (Daniel Craig).

Soderbergh is selective in the information he gives to his audience. We know enough to keep us viewing and this allows the story to go along, but don't expect an inch more. Jimmy is a former college football star who is down on his luck- adored by his daughter and hated by his ex-wife (Katie Holmes) he is barely scraping by. The two brothers are a continual source of amusement, Clyde, in particular, has a sharp sense of humour that totally offsets his dimwit presentation. Only having one-arm after serving in Iraq, Clyde believes fully in the 'Logan Family Curse'. Joe Bang is the character that will stick in the memory longest. A hulking, bleach blonde lunatic, Bang is essential to the plan due to his experience blowing up bank vaults. Grumbling about having to eat 'fake salt' with his beloved boiled eggs, there is an impressive set of brains underneath that will prove vital.

The heist itself rumbles along a furious pace and we are continually having to stop and check our knowledge. Being rookie bank robbers, the family is constantly having to readjust the plan. Jimmy, fortunately, has insider knowledge but even he has not accounted for the little details. One humorous moment sees Bang and the brothers arguing over whether one of the money slots is 20 or 30 yards away? "We're dealin' with science here!" moans our blonde criminal. Soderbergh refuses to hit the breaks and even the smallest details could be so crucial to our knowledge. This is a mostly well-oiled machine and when it fires Logan Lucky becomes his best outing in some time. Unfortunately, it is his fast and furious approach to the story that lets this picture down somewhere.

One of the most frustrating aspects of this movie is that there is a number of minor characters who spring up to do absolutely nothing. What precisely was the point of Seth MacFarlane's unlikeable British millionaire? Except being brash and obnoxious, this character adds little. Likewise the excellent Sebastien Stan and Katherine Waterston who pop up in brief unexplained cameos and promptly disappear. There is a closing investigation with a heavily underused Hilary Swank which only runs out the clock rather than adding another dimension. Soderbergh, for the most part, has made a solid thriller but all these unnecessary extra's only confuse everyone.

Channing Tatum again proves that underneath that well-toned body lies an actor with a lot of talent. As Jimmy, he is the beefcake out to snag the big prize. Once again Tatum is able to appeal to the likable side of a character and his dopey smarts are a joy to behold. Adam Driver again is on dazzling form as loyal bro Clyde. Coming off as the idiot brother bartender, underneath there is bravery and wit in spades. One of the more watchable modern actors, Driver almost steals the film. Daniel Craig however, takes the acting honors and his Joe Bang is a mile away from 007. Few actors alive can mix charisma with sheer menace, but Craig carries it off effortlessly. It's a big reminder of what a great actor he is no matter what suit he puts on.

Logan Lucky is a movie that despite its shortcomings demonstrates why cinema is all the richer for having Steven Soderbergh.

Game Over Man: Review of Alien: Covenant

Alien: Covenant

Director: Ridley Scott

By Alex Watson

Ridley Scott's third outing in the Alien universe gets the franchise back on the right lines. Alien: Covenant isn't a perfect blockbuster by any means, but has a far stronger story and greater thrills than the ill-fated Prometheus. While the script by John Ridley does have the odd fault in logic, it's great to see Sir Ridley finally returning this franchise towards its roots again.

Travelling to start a new colony on planet Origae-6, the crew of the USCSS Covenant receives what looks to be a distress signal from another planet. Officer Daniels Branson (Katherine Waterston) is against investigating and insists the mission go on. However, Captain Oram (Billy Crudup) is overly curious about what lies there and the crew isn't keen on going back into hypersleep. When the crew reach the earth-like planet, they meet David (Michael Fassbender), the survivor of Prometheus and immediately his intentions come into question.

Alien: Covenant is given a big opening shake up. Hit by a freak neutrino blast from deep space, android Walter (also Fassbender) is forced to wake the crew early. Demoralised by a death of a beloved crew member, Oram is forced into the Lt. Gorman role and his unpopular decision making is quickly what dooms everyone. What it means to be human is another major subplot touched upon. Opening before the events of Prometheus, David is shown being given a lecture by a young Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce) about gods and creation. While playing an 'anaemic' piano rendition of Wagner's 'Entry of the Gods into Valhalla' the creation points out to tell his wannabe god maker "You will die, I will not!" David is the lynchpin throughout Scott's movie, so memorable before and the real lurking threat here. His appearance at first feels like divine intervention, but after we start viewing his 'amateur zoology' our views becomes very skewed.

When the crew the land on the mysterious planet, it seems almost too good to be true. Although it seems habitable, Daniels is quick to notice there are no birds or animals. Soon things get dark and intense and Scott thankfully gives us the return of some many of our beloved creatures such a face huggers and of course, the Xenomorphs! The creatures in this picture play second fiddle to the jump scares and when crew members start having weird objects bursting out their chests- the body count starts to rack up. Although the frequent kills do offer some genuinely creepy moments, there is a lot of other mumbo jumbo that gets in the way. The side plot of David weeding his influence over fellow droid Walter does make for some fine acting moment's- especially his recital of the poem 'Ozymandias' and their flute playing lessons together. The unnecessary diversion into how their kind was not meant to serve and the dreams that affect them only pushes the film away from where it needs to be.

Another issue is the crew themselves, Daniels while affected and suffering from her loss is not a strong enough character for the film to rely on. Likewise with the blundering Oram who seems to continuously worry that is faith will affect his ability to lead this crew. This issue was also present in Prometheus and this crew just feels like a group that is a buffet meal for the aliens. When Scott plays the hits, the plays them well. One claustrophobic sequence sees crew member Karine (Carmen Ejogo) quarantined while a mysterious creature begins to splatter out of her deceased crewmate! While there some good individual moments, it can't beat feeling formulaic. Scott feels like he is desperately trying to recapture the magic of his 1979 classic. Alien: Covenant is a solid entry into this franchise, but not one its fans will fully embrace- despite Mother finally being back!

Katherine Waterston gives it her all as Daniels but she just isn't the strong female character this movie desires. Taking up the torch from Sigourney Weaver is a tough ask- Noomi Rapace also gave unstuck previously. The problem is her character just feels like a blank page and John Ridley didn't seem too bothered about filling it. Out of the all supporting character only Danny McBride's pilot, Tennessee has any kind of likeability. After playing so many memorable jerks in shows like Eastbound and Down and Vice Principals, McBride seems at ease in the role of supporting hero. Once more Michael Fassbender steals the show, only this time he steals it twice. Both Walter and David are Ying and Yang on the persona front. David comes across as the gift that went spectacularly wrong. Through Fassbender, the movie's true villain is born.

Alien: Covenant does give us some joy seeing some of the touches we know and love. Ridley Scott just cannot fully seal the deal.

Beasts of The New York Wild: Review of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

Director: David Yates

By Alex Watson

The return to the Harry Potter universe is an enjoyable one by director David Yates. While Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is an adventure that is great to look at, it doesn't quite conjure up the same sense of wonder. Yates draws into a world of unlimited imagination where effects seem to come second to knowing our characters. Eddie Redmayne makes for a capable lead, but JK Rowlings first attempt at a script is slightly incomplete.

Former Hogwarts pupil Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) arrives in New York to promote his work on magical creatures. However, magic is under fire in New York after several recent events. Accidentally crossing paths with wannabe muggle baker Jacob (Dan Fogler) will bring him into the path of ex-Auror Porpentina Goldstein (Katherine Waterston). All the while, a war against magic is being waged by activist Mary Lou Barebone (Samantha Morton).

The creation of the new beasts and a brave step in a new pre-Potter world are what gives Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them its success. The new creatures are visually dazzling, top marks go to thieving platypus the Niffler, whose antics are a new ending sources of laughs. From the moment Newt Scamander arrives in New York, trouble seems to find him, During one encounter at the bank, he accidentally swaps suitcases with Jacob. Arrested by Porpentina, she drags Newt back to MACUSA (the US Magic Ministry) as perceives him to be a magical threat. The moment Jacob opens his wrong suitcase, all hell breaks lose and the bulk of the picture is spent chasing down these various beats around the Big Apple. Tina's boss Seraphina Picquery (Carmen Ejogo) is concerned with the effect this will have after the recent attacks by renowned wizard Grimmewald. Sinister MACUSA agent Graves (Colin Farrell) seems to have his own sinister agenda.

Chasing the beasts across a variety of awkward big city locations is definitely a great comic touch. One scene sees them chasing a horny female rhino creature across a frozen New York zoo. The main trouble comes from Newt being a rather weakly written character. A socially awkward and clumsy wizard, this person doesn't really have the needed spark the story requires. Jacob as a 'Non-Maj' dragged into the wizarding world is one we identify with more closely. A good funny relief, he is the audience's vision and like us, he is trying to make sense of it. His love story with Tina's alluring sister Queenie (Alison Sudol) is pleasant but doesn't feel necessary in this type of film. Together Newt and Tina make a good team, but their potential attraction feels drastically underwritten. Graves is a character who has a good sense of mystery about him as he investigates a series of random attacks by an invisible force. The supporting roles seem richer despite less time, particularly Morton's villainous Barebone. Her badly abused son Credence (Ezra Miller) is a wonderfully dark character that lurks in the shadows.

The third does make Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them to life. The invisible force has caused havoc throughout, even resulting in the death of an important son of newspaper mogul Henry Shaw Sr (Jon Voight). Finally, during this stretch, Newt gets the chance to play hero onscreen. The numerous creature chase sequences eventually draw out the pictures running time unnecessarily. When he focus on the principle threat plague threatening the city, he emerges as a clever and bold hero who could grow with the right material. Aided by his glorious big bird Frank, Newt shows real brains when the game is on the line, showing that creatures, not humans are his real forte. Unfortunately for all the last act's twists and turns, it contains a big reveal that's far too easy to predict. Although it does boast one of 2016's most unexpected A-lister cameos. JK Rowling's script might not all it wants to be, but it sure is great fun. Yates is able to keep the magic alive where needed and he is definitely the go-to man for this series.

Eddie Redmayne does the best with the material he is given as Newt Scamander. While watching him do an awkward mating dance for a hippo creature makes us cringe, Redmayne is able to bring across the more socially isolated part. Presented your typical bumbling Englishman abroad, Redmayne is able to bring across a depth such as his pining for an acquaintance who once wronged him. More impressively he is given a bravery when the game is on the line and that finally makes us root for him. Katherine Waterston is a talented actress is a rather beige role as Tina Goldstein and while her heart is commendable, she is never given anything to draw us in. Dan Fogler is by the given the strongest supporting role and as muggle Jacob, he is a revelation. Embodying the audiences conscience and desire to see this world, Fogler looks like a kid in a candy store.

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them offers wonderful visual excitement and is another very entertaining piece. Unfortunately, it just doesn't feel different from anything else we've seen in this universe.

The Innovator: Review of Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs

Director: Danny Boyle

By Alex Watson

Although it lacks the needed back story about the rise of one of this centuries greatest innovators, Steve Jobs is still a fine picture by Danny Boyle. Aided by a typical talkative Aaron Sorkin script, events play out like more of a three act play than a cinematic piece. Jobs is not made out as likable by any means but his dedication and ambition to his craft is always admirable. His relationship with those around him however, gives his life a more strained feel.

Examining three very significant events in the life of Steve Jobs (Michael Fassbender) such as the release of the ill-fated first Apple Macintosh which would lead to his dismissal. Through these moments we witness the fiery determination and the towering ego which although brought him worldwide admiration, also alienated him from those closest to him. 

Steve Jobs gives us a breathless opening inning where the clock counts down to the first launch of the Apple Mac in 1984. Jobs is fiercely determined to make his beloved machine speak 'Hello' to its audience. On display in this sequence is a complex array of emotions as Jobs berates, charms and threatens his 'Work Wife' Joanna Hoffman (A terrific Kate Winslet) and engineer Andy Hertzfeld (Michael Stuhlbarg). In this sequence we also gain a window into his human side and more importantly, his stubbornness. Jobs refuses to accept that his daughter Lisa is his child even though it has been proven. Her mother Chrisann (Katherine Waterston) cannot fathom the reason for this rejection and Jobs clings to the same algorithm that 28% of population could be the father. 

Danny Boyle doesn't set out to make Jobs any kind of Martyr figure and in truth he is both hero and villain combined. Despite warnings from Joanna such as “If you keep on alienating people for no reason, there will be no one left to say ‘Hello!’Jobs' ego makes him pay the greatest price. After he irreparably strains his relationship with Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak (Seth Rogan) and CEO John Sculley (Jeff Daniels) due the failure of the Mac and his refusal to acknowledge the success of the Apple II- he is inevitably forced out. Rather painting this as a revenge or redemption piece, Boyle instead focus on the man himself. Through this he lifts the lid and reveals the self-doubt that Jobs feels within himself, perhaps brought on by his adoption as a child. 

For all its merits, it does feel disappointing that Steve Jobs only focuses on the early years and not the breakthrough products such as the iPad. We are only briefly given windows into the early life of Jobs which although provided momentary glimpses of a far different man is not nearly enough. Boyle focuses on the technical innovation that made this man an almost god like figure to the people who brought products. Jobs believed that computers should almost be as a friendly as people themselves and his perfectionism that angered colleagues was because he believed something . There are subtle hints towards the future products that would cement the Apple name, such as his preference for all rectangle corners be rounded. In the end, Boyle does a great job of making a difficult persona into something fascinating. 

As the man himself, Michael Fassbender proves the perfect jobs as the Apple impresario. Effectively channeling his insecurities with himself along with his sophistry, Fassbender holds the movies centre with such force that eclipses all others. By far one of the best leading men this year, this could be movie another Oscar nod coming right up. Kate Winslet refuses to get upstaged by Fassbender and rings in her own fine turn as the dry humoured Hoffman. In a dowdy and more low key performance, Katherine Waterston wins the most sympathy as Chrisann Brennan, a woman struggling to raise the very daughter that Jobs frequently rejects. 

Steve Jobs might not be a movie for everyone to appreciate, but the sheer power of its central performance lights up the picture. David Fincher may have rejected the chance to bring Jobs to the screen, but Danny Boyle has proven to the perfect man to do so.

LA Confidential: Review of Inherent Vice

Inherent Vice

Director: Paul Thomas Anderson

By Alex Watson

The cinema of PT Anderson is always an engaging experience unlike any you will ever see. With his work such as Boogie Nights, There Will Be Blood and his most recent effort, The Master there is always a strong sense of realism mixed with an almost ambient aura surrounding it. So far critically he has yet to put a foot wrong and his new effort adapting Thomas Pyncheon's 2009 novel, Inherent Vice might be another fine addition to an increasingly impressive collection.

Larry 'Doc' Sportello is a LA based private eye who is given a surprise when his ex girlfriend Shasta Fay Hepworth (Katherine Waterston) emerges from a long absence needing his help regarding the disappearance of her rich and powerful boyfriend. The resulting case will produce a web so complex Doc will have his work cut out. Also he has managed to run afoul of notorious LAPD Detective Christian 'Bigfoot' Bjornsen (Josh Brolin).

Inherent Vice is an Anderson movie that both excels but at the same time is immensely flawed. My first advice before viewing this film is to go with the flow because the central story line is one that will send your mind in all kinds of directions. In short, the disappearance of a real estate tycoon is the simple part of this whole mystery and there diversions galore to keep our minds ticking. Doc will also have to contend with Neo-Nazi's, saxophone player, Coy (Owen Wilson) who may or may not be a triple agent and an Indo-China cartel called The Golden Fang.

The principle difficulty in the analysis of this picture is that although the movie possesses a sharp and wicked sense of zany humour, it also has a heavy cloud of density hanging over it. All throughout there are red herrings and rumors that drive the plot which make for great and unpredictable viewing. What is the Golden Fang? They could be everything to do with the vanishing or could also be another detour from the path to discovery. However, sadly we are not left with any kind of clear answers. Artistically this could be clever trickery by Anderson and it could well be on multiple viewings that the real answer finally emerges.

Doc Sportello as a man is one who is very much of the pot smoking 70's and underneath his glazed eyes and his straw hat is a man who has become locked into one hell of a puzzle. In an era where the dreams of the 1960's have long since faded, Doc is a man who simply exists and his almost lathergic approach bizarrely endears him. In one scene, we see him write 'Seriously Smoking' on his notebook when interview a potential witness. His constant harassment by the Bigfoot gives the movies its main sense of laughs. The burly copper is fond of his civil rights violations but even more so of tormenting his hippie enemy/helper. Their phone calls (in particular Doc being dressed down by Mrs Bigfoot) make for some uncomfortably hilarious viewing.

Joaquin Phoenix is proving to be the new go to man for Anderson and as Doc he succeeds in bringing a real human quality to the role. Unlike the conflicted and impulsively violent Freddie Qualyle, Doc is like a passive counterpart who is having to up his level of thinking in order to survive. Phoenix also succeeds in bringing some great natural humour- his reaction to Jena Malone's picture is just genius. Among the starry cameos such as Reese Witherspoon, Benicio Del Toro and Owen Wilson, it is Josh Brolin who claims top supporting honours and as the borderline demented Bjornson, he is a thumping and bold presence.

Inherent Vice is a picture will be most likely be considered to wayward and scruffy to appeal for Academy Voters come prize time. But it is still a picture that deserves to be analysed over the coming years if only to unlock the mystery.